Saturday, 29 July 2023

Jeepers Creepers 3

Beginning at the conclusion of the first film, outside of the police station where The Creeper has been attacked and lost, the apparently abandoned truck is towed away, intended to be impounded.  On route, The Creeper reappears and following a couple of deaths reacquires his truck, hiding it away in an open (!) field.  It is discovered by some arrogant teens but as with the cops they can find no way of boarding the vehicle, filled as it is with booby traps.  Meanwhile some cops and a team of vigilantes head out to track and finish the monster.  Elsewhere a grandmother whose son, Kenny, was once taken by the creature now has visions of her dead son and his warnings, whilst musing over revenge.  Kenny's niece attracts the attention of the monster and all are gradually brought together in a showdown to stop his insatiable lust over human body parts.

I feel there are several flaws with Jeepers Creepers 3 that did not afflict the previous outings.  The story meanders around confusingly over a severed hand that holds the key to information, and many characters that crisscross one another as they become mixed up in the monster's activities.  The previous entries took time to build up suspense, giving the characters something to become increasingly terrified about, whereas here the action starts from the first second.  Some may see this as advantageous, however, I don't feel that it works in the film's favour.  The other aspect that presents weakness is The Creeper himself.  Again, he is ably played by Jonathan Breck, however, the creature is fully visible in sunny daylight most of the time.  No attempt is made to conceal him as was the case in parts 1 and 2, thus - despite looking pretty cool - his impact is inevitably lessened.  The film is a reasonable time-passer maybe, on the other hand a bit of a let-down following two superior chapters.  The one nifty aspect of part 3 is that it winds up being a nice bridge between the first and second parts (with a cameo from one of the first film's characters at the conclusion).

Released in the UK on Blu-ray by 101 Films, the disc reminds me of a budget acquisition in the early days of DVD - there are no extras at all (not even a trailer) and the menu simply provides the viewer with a 'Play' option, no chapter selections, nothing!  Still, the film looks nice - 2.35:1 HD, it is very sharp and detailed disadvantaged only by a bitrate/lazy encode that can't always keep up, resulting in banding where colour gradations should be smooth.  The audio defaults to stereo but can be switched to 5.1, thankfully, for a competent track that exhibits some source mixing issues.  Overall the presentation is reasonable and the barebones disc can be picked up without too much financial outlay.

Saturday, 22 July 2023

Jeepers Creepers 2

Jeepers Creepers 2 prologues with a farmer witnessing his son being whisked off by 'The Creeper', a creature that awakens every twenty three years to feed (on humans) for a month.  Switching scene to a bus-load of football players (alongside a handful of cheerleaders) who are heading back home after a victory, their vehicle succumbs to what appears initially to be a tyre blow-out.  The driver finds evidence that it might have been caused deliberately (due to the embedded presence of an arcane shuriken), but they are unsure by who, or what.  Unable to get moving they try, in vain with it being quite a remote road, to radio for help.  Then one of the group is pulled off into the air by an unseen assailant.  Panic ensues, the group pile back onto the bus, which from then on offers only limited protection for them from the creature lurking outside and clearly intent on picking them off, one terrified individual at a time.

Following in the footsteps of the popular Jeepers Creepers only two years later (2003), this slightly longer sequel brings us an entirely fresh group of victims, sorry, people.  Returning, naturally, is The Creeper of course, as well as a fleeting appearance by Justin Long as Darry.  Again I think there is a well-handled, methodical build-up, outside of the prologue, with the group initially starting off as a brash, overly-confident bunch that are gradually brought back down to earth as their situation becomes starkly critical.  I love the performances throughout this film, I think the actors nail the arrogant-gradually terrified characters nicely - some fine drama/conflict ensuing along the way - and obviously Jonathan Breck pins down The Creeper's blackly humorous, simultaneously nasty character as though he was made for the role.  The stranded-bus setting, utilised for most of the story, has great power in its natural limitations, oddly claustrophobic despite the whole thing taking place aside open fields.  This entry in the series in my view matches the quality of the first film, and likewise has stood up well over time.

As with the first film, my copy is part of a double-bill Blu-ray pack (imported from the US), although extras-free for the second entry unfortunately.  Jeepers Creepers 2 has a good 2.35:1 HD transfer, adequately grainy and colourful.  The surround (DTS 5.1) track has great cinematic power, well-mixed and delivering a fine audio experience.  At time of writing the Germans have released what appears to be a superior edition of part 2 (both as special limited packaging and standard edition), although it is oddly absent on Blu-ray in the UK, so it is a case of importing it from the US or Deutschland.

Friday, 21 July 2023

Jeepers Creepers

Brother and sister duo (Justin Long and Gina Philips as Darry and Trish respectively) are travelling across country to visit parents when a maniacal truck driver nearly pushes them off road.  Not long after that they pass an old church where they believe they see the driver forcing bloody bodies down a chute.  Later on, when they notice the same strange character pass by in his truck, they (or more so, Darry) see an opportunity to head back to the church to investigate whether whoever was being dropped down the chute is still alive and needs help.  Trish is not exactly keen on this idea but goes along with it.  Reaching the church, Darry stupidly slips down the chute himself while trying to see what's down there.  He does of course find out personally - a cave full of corpses stitched together and mutilated and/or preserved.  Managing to locate a way out the perturbed Darry re-joins his sister and they both head to the nearest town to attract help.  That is not the only thing they've attracted, however, because the aforementioned driver is clearly not oblivious to their meddling, or the smell of their fear...

A surprisingly effective horror from Victor Salva, a tangible sense of mystery is built up during the first half or so of the film as the siblings embroil themselves in a troublesome scenario, the gruesome likes of which they didn't at the beginning imagine (otherwise they may have bypassed it quite voluntarily!).  The mystery element has been dampened somewhat by sequels but that shouldn't take away what was achieved here at the time (2001).  'The Creeper' himself (a mute Jonathan Breck, who would appear in the role for all three of Salva's Jeepers Creepers outings) is a fantastically macabre creation, part slasher villain, part supernatural monster, he is concealed/revealed to just about the right extent and at the right pace to keep him suitably scary.  He also has a nasty habit of consuming body parts to provide himself with physical functionality (shades of Dr Freudstein from the legendary House by the Cemetery perhaps), as well as sniffing the fear of others, amongst other habits.  Overall, Jeepers Creepers has stood up well over the couple of decades since its original release.

My copy is part of an MGM/Fox double bill Blu-ray with Jeepers Creepers 2, imported from the US.  The film is presented reasonably well, with grain visible, at 1.85:1 and backed with a DTS 5.1 audio track that is quite strong.  Extras-wise, the disc for the first film aped its previous release(s), while the encoding locks it to region A (US).  There has since been a superior release of the first film in the UK from 101 Films, essentially porting the 2016 Scream Factory edition.

Saturday, 29 April 2023

Two Orphan Vampires

Two Orphan Vampires (which I'd probably give 2.5/5) has interesting aspects but it's not my favourite of Rollin's and probably could have done with some trimming.  It features the adventures of two blind orphans who regain their sight nocturnally, but also go on the prowl as blood-drinking ghouls.  They become adopted by a priest, but it really is just a cover for their vampiric activities.  It's purely strange fantasy and is not meant to be considered as serious drama.  The score itself works fantastically in some places but is cumbersome in others.  Probably not the best one to start with if you're unfamiliar with Rollin's work (for that I would suggest Requiem for a Vampire, Shiver of the Vampires, or Fascination), but if you are familiar and like what he did in the 70s/80s then this one does hold some value.  There is one standout sequence for me - the cemetery chase (bizarre in many respects) which leads to the two girls discovering a residing vampire who lends them her underground lair for the night.  It's the strongest five minutes or so of the film, oozing supernatural, funereal ambience.

Regarding what Indicator have produced.  Firstly, I'm surprised they've gone with more niche Euro horror titles for their 4K debuts, but as a fan of that area I am not complaining one bit.  The other simultaneous release (which I've also received but not watched yet) is Shiver of the Vampires, and that one definitely is one of my favourites.  Two Orphan Vampires is presented properly in this new edition at 1.66:1.  You have French language and English language audio tracks to choose from, with good English language translated subtitles for the former.  Personally I would not recommend watching the film in English, French is the way to go, but it's fantastic that the choice is there.

The 90s low-budget cinematography does not always make for the prettiest of viewing, although Rollin makes his usual atmospheric use of locations, and there are a couple of inspired moments.  The new 4K transfer retains grain in abundance and detail is as high as might be possible with the film - it looks natural, organic, and probably as fine as it can.   Colours are often subdued so the HDR doesn't have to work too hard.  In comparison with the previous Blu-ray from Redemption, the new disc has a finer and more consistent grain structure with a touch more detail (although I would give credit to the Redemption release for being very good).  The French language track (mono) sounds very clean, and the subs are highly legible.  I'd say Indicator have done a respectful job with this, it is the best home video presentation (previously I bought the Redemption Blu-ray as mentioned, and the Shriek Show DVD before that, which was awful).

The extras list is comprehensive, as you might expect from Indicator, they've put a lot of effort into the filmed work.  The outer package might not be what you anticipate if you're got the likes of Night of the Demon and Swimmer LEs in your collection - the slipcase is much slimmer, closer to the thickness of a normal Blu-ray.  Inside are two components: a digipack style holder for the disc, and a very high quality booklet which overall lends the package a weighty and classy feel.  Indicator have thoughtfully (and other labels producing 'Limited Editions' should take note of the this!) individually numbered the rear side of the outer case - I understand that the UHD is limited to 6000 worldwide and the Blu-ray equivalent 4000.

This will be the last release you would ever need of this latter day Rollin, I'm quite sure of that!  A fine debut to 4K for one of the best boutique labels.

Saturday, 18 March 2023

Hammer House of Horror

Following the gradual decline of Hammer’s film output during the seventies it was time to devote their attentions to something less expensive but lucrative enough to permit them to maintain business: television. The potential of the medium had clearly already been recognised by the company because Hammer themselves had previously adapted one or two popular series for the big screen in the shape of, for example, On the Buses. While most of Hammer’s more macabre cinematic outings were essentially gothic period pieces, the television work of the eighties took a much more contemporary stance by rooting scenarios in modern times, this probably being a smart move because it enabled a wider audience the chance to identify with the characters and material despite the fantastical but horrific nature of many of the situations.

Spanning across (appropriately enough) only thirteen episodes there is a variable quality (as with any television series) but the overall impression of Hammer House of Horror is surprisingly upmarket, this notably aided by the fact that it was shot on film rather than video. Aside from a generally average to good standard of acting these episodes don’t feel as cheap as one might expect, exhibiting the consistently well-crafted work of skilled technicians in their field.  Additionally, the location work was pleasing and will make older (50+) UK viewers feel at home with realistic depictions of a picturesque span of English backdrops from the era.

A couple of years following Hammer House of Horror the company produced another series called Hammer House of Mystery and Suspense, but these were padded to feature length in order to meet the US broadcast criteria dictated by a movie of the week slot. The later series suffered as a result but HHOH itself was kept to a sensible fifty-four minutes per episode, thus gifting the stories enough space to breathe without too much risk of boring the viewer. The opening/closing music score was a suitably melancholic and dark piece, reminding me of the wonderful score that came soon after for Lucio Fulci’s House by the Cemetery. The stories themselves revolved around concepts of fear and the macabre, it goes without saying, but what may be less expected is that sometimes the feeling of unease projected from a story actually worked and there are a number of moments throughout the run that can still induce a chill through the body. It is, therefore, a sporadically successful piece of work in my opinion. Don’t look for something to cheer you up too much either - whereas the studio’s movie output tended to find good triumphing over evil, conversely there were rarely happy endings in Hammer’s TV House of Horror.

During the DVD boom Carlton blessed us with a 4-disc set containing the entire series of HHOH, an average of three episodes per disc and, though not sequenced in their original broadcast order, this was no great problem considering the unrelated nature of the stories. They were presented in their original academy aspect ratios with DD2.0 audio, and each looked sharp, detailed and naturally coloured. A few years later Network delivered upon the UK a Blu-ray set, which is the best way to view and own this sometimes overlooked series. Image quality of the new Blu-rays is excellent (thank heavens they used film to shoot the series), vivid, and surprisingly clean throughout.  The menus are also presented with a lovely Rocky Horror-esque blood dripping font.  Furthermore, the original broadcast order appears to have been restored for the Blu-rays, plus it goes without saying that the Blu-rays project the films at the correct running speed rather than the accelerated versions (due to PAL) of the DVDs.  During the following synopses and opinions, I’ve attempted to refrain from using spoilers.


Episode guide

Witching Time; Directed by Don Leaver; UK Transmission 13th September 1980

A film music composer in the throes of domestic problems encounters a disheveled woman in his barn during a stormy night. She claims to be a witch who has, moments prior, travelled through time from a point several hundred years earlier when she was about to be burnt at the stake – if ever there was a useful moment to initiate time travel!  After mating with her she soon begins to take a supernatural control over his life, and his situation is not helped when she seems to disappear every time someone else is around - soon his sanity comes into question, but things start to turn really nasty as his estranged wife’s life is threatened. Quite a sexy entry in the series (containing some nudity, surprisingly) featuring a gripping climax. Jon Finch (Frenzy) brings his usual emotionally charged performance to the proceedings though the character’s fashion statements are inevitably a little out of date now. Overall, an average episode demonstrating a handful of elements to push it upwards in the quality stakes by a couple of notches.


The Thirteenth Reunion; Directed by Peter Sasdy; UK Transmission 20th September 1980

Writing for the woman’s page of a newspaper, Ruth Cairns is presented with what she feels is yet another trivial assignment when her editor asks her to investigate a harsh but revolutionary new dieting process being promoted by an independent hospital. There she finds attendees are virtually humiliated into slimming by a sergeant-like motivator, but there’s some light when she meets a professional man there who takes her to dinner and subsequently arranges to see her again. On his way home he becomes the victim of a fatal car accident; her suspicions are aroused when one of the employees of the local funeral parlour comes to her suggesting something strange is going on, with bodies being unofficially shuffled about and the like. Thinking she’s finally onto a decent scoop she probes further only to find the body of her newfound boyfriend-to-be (or not-to-be, as the case turned out) is missing. What draws her attention back to the slimming club is the apparent fact that they were contrarily trying to ‘fatten’ him up just before his death. Packing a fair few ideas into its fifty+ minutes this one certainly doesn’t waste much time, taking the heroine through a number of locations and in confrontation with several people as she gets deeper into her quest, which is ultimately one of career advancement. A couple of the scenarios presented are hardly politically correct in today’s society, demonstrating as they do the onscreen humiliation of fat people for example, but this was made in an era when people weren’t specifically looking to become offended due to some self proclaimed understanding of what makes an ideal world. I’m rarely concerned by such material, preferring to leave that to the acute political perceptiveness of others while I sit back and enjoy what I’m watching (that was, after all, the fundamental objective). Julia Foster plays her character amicably under the assured direction of Peter Sasdy. The final act is ahead of its time and suitably morbid, ending on a rather anti-commercial note, though I’ll refrain from giving details so as to not spoil it for others. Thanks to a story that’s a little more varied than what one might expect for television of the period, as well as the irreverent nature of the outcome, this proves to be one of the better HHOH episodes.


Rude Awakening; Directed by Peter Sasdy; UK Transmission 27th September 1980

This story repeatedly follows the activities of an estate agent who seems perpetually doomed to waking up and living each day only to find that the day was in fact a dream. Each morning he wakes up next to a wife with whom he has an unsatisfactory relationship, heads off to work where he flirts with his sexually charged secretary, has a call to visit a property that turns out to be disastrous or non-existent, and is accused at some point of killing the very wife that he woke up next to earlier on. This is a really interesting premise, taking on a Twilight Zone type of narrative and utilising the charismatic talents of Denholm Elliot in the lead role. Early on the viewer suspects (once they realise he’s reliving a dream with various threads of consistency) that the tale will become boring, but it actually becomes progressively more intriguing as we attempt to piece together a very Lynchian puzzle. Lucy Gutteridge’s alluring secretary mysteriously takes on different personas in each dream while Elliot’s character simply can’t understand why his memory continues to process information normally while all around him are oblivious to his plight, passing through stages of confusion right to a point where he simply accepts/believes that what he’s experiencing is only part of a dream. This kind of confrontation with the nature of one’s perception of reality fascinates me, while the story itself must surely have been an inspiration behind the Danny Rubin early 90s story that became Groundhog Day.


Growing Pains; Directed by Francis Megahy; UK Transmission 4th October 1980

With what initially appears to be an almost Omen-like scenario, Terence and Laurie Morton (grieving from the strange death of their natural son) adopt an unusual child who seems to be responsible for all manner of ghastly occurrences from cars spinning out of control to maggots materialising on food and influence over an uncharacteristically homicidal rottweiler. Simultaneously his botanist surrogate father is working on a plant that is intended to help with third world starvation by providing an abundance of protein, a potential side effect being hallucinogenic effects - are the family imagining it or is there something more supernatural happening thanks to their newly acquired child? While the episode is not especially admired it does manage to maintain a sense of the uncanny throughout as we’re kept on our toes by the decidedly unorthodox behaviour of the Mortons’ new son. He reminds me a little of the offbeat girl from The Child and, while the actor himself seems incapable of realistically reflecting emotion in his performance, the largely apathetic role suits his range of abilities and blank face quite well. The ambiguity of the narrative may have been intentional or it could be a sign that the film-makers themselves were unsure which direction to take it, something that becomes vaguely apparent by the final quarter.


The House That Bled To Death; Directed by Tom Clegg; UK Transmission 11th October 1980

A couple of new homeowners and child move into a house that was previously an accursed place where a husband poisoned his wife before cutting up the body and burying her under the patio (and just about anywhere else he could find an unused spot to dig a hole). Their arrival is followed by bouts of unexplained activity: the wife is nearly gassed, blood pours from various structural orifices, knives disappear and reappear, etc. While there are illogical details that only really materialise upon the film’s denouement, there is a sense of unease that develops as tale progresses, a constant feeling that something frightening is about to happen. Regardless of the final act the film works quite well, at least partly because we’re not aware if there are actual ghosts in the house, if the house itself is possessed, or the occupants are plain mad - it remains unexplained for the large part and this is an aid to the dread that is conjured up.


Charlie Boy; Directed by Robert Young; UK Transmission 18th October 1980

After being the near victims of a road rage madman, a couple who’ve recently discovered an authentic antique voodoo doll (affectionately named ‘Charlie Boy’) facetiously place a curse on the man. Thinking nothing more of it, they’re disturbed to find out the man has later been murdered. But then their friends begin dying one by one, seemingly in the order they’re standing in a photograph. Initially sceptical about the doll’s voodoo power they begin to believe that it is responsible for the deaths and seek a way of destroying it before they themselves fall victim - they’re next in line on the photograph… Not a completely original idea but one that could have been developed into something much more creepy given the inherently eerie nature of its central concept. What proves to be an obstacle to the episode’s success seems to be the pedestrian abilities of the director. The road rage (not a term used at the time obviously) threat is executed in such a lame manner that all possible tension is rapidly disposed of, and later on when the doll’s existence comes under threat the music that should have contributed to the impact of the scene actually turns the whole thing on its head with a completely inappropriate approach. What we’re left with is something very average and non-enticing.


Silent Scream; Directed by Alan Gibson; UK Transmission 25th October 1980

A frail pet shop owner (Peter Cushing) is conducting experiments in captivity without the use of prison bars, i.e. training individuals to voluntarily stay within a confined area essentially through the use of electric shocks as a means of shaping behaviour). He uses animals to hone his techniques, basically exercises in classical conditioning, until an old inmate acquaintance attempts to steal something from him. The man himself triggers a trap which contains him in an underground room, this providing the slightly unhinged wannabe-scientist a chance to practise his theories with humans. Luckily the man’s girlfriend notices that he’s missing and heads off to find out what’s happened to him, neither of the couple realising that the old man is smarter than they anticipate. Tapping into ideas relating to academic psychology provides an interesting slant and Cushing himself creates a cold and nasty sort of character, these factors working in the episode’s favour. Brian Cox does quite a nice job as the inmate who becomes imprisoned once again; hard to believe just a few years later he would be playing Hannibal Lecktor (as spelt in Manhunter). It’s an otherwise average story that merely passes the time.


Children of the Full Moon; Directed by Tom Clegg; UK Transmission 1st November 1980

Newly married couple, Tom and Sarah, are on their way to stay at an isolated rural house when their car develops a serious malfunction causing them to bring a halt to the journey. Heading off into the woods by foot they stumble across an old mansion, asking the owner if they might use the telephone. The place is populated by an odd Hungarian woman who cultivates a group of young children, some her own, some supposedly fostered. It’s also home to her unseen husband. After having no luck finding some help they’re welcomed to stay for the night, but heading off to the car to collect some things Tom returns in a panic saying he was chased by something half human. In the middle of the night Sarah thinks she sees some creature at the window: Tom goes off to investigate. While he’s out Sarah is attacked by the creature in front of a hoard of smiling children, and Tom falls while attempting to climb back into the house, knocking himself unconscious. Waking up in hospital his wife tells him, contrary to what he thought he experienced, that he must have dreamt the whole thing, as they were actually in a car crash. Temporarily believing her he is somewhat perturbed to find, following the unexpected announcement of her pregnancy, that she’s not behaving like her normal self.  I believe this episode is amongst the most fondly remembered of the series. It’s a fairly traditional piece that rises above the norm with a suitably sinister family and, as is fairly common for HHOH, a country location off the beaten track - these places seemingly home to all manner of nasties. The episode also concludes in a pretty dark fashion, rounding out a satisfying tale that could easily have been extended to feature length.


Carpathian Eagle; Directed by Francis Megahy; UK Transmission 8th November 1980

A crazy femme fatale is loose and choosing seemingly random male victims to butcher before disappearing to leave the police with a serial killer mystery on their hands. The officer in charge of the investigation (Anthony Valentine) meets up with a female writer whose work seems to – perhaps a little too closely - resemble the modus operandi used by the killer. His relationship with the creative woman nonetheless quickly progresses. What he doesn’t realise is that she becomes so obsessed with her own work that an apparent affliction of Dissociative Identity Disorder (split personality) is causing her to virtually become her subjects even to homicidal extremes. Don’t worry about this being a spoiler as the point is revealed fairly early on. While the story ends in a relatively mundane fashion it is kept alive by an adeptly crafted script and excellent standards of acting from Valentine (who passed away in 2015). Suzanne Danielle also makes a striking lead female but most amusing is the appearance of a young Pierce Brosnan as a hormone-driven jogger who is brutally murdered after all of about four minutes of screen time - bet this doesn’t go on his CV anymore.


Guardian of the Abyss; Directed by Don Sharp; UK Transmission 15th November 1980

Beginning almost in the tradition of a Hammer movie we’re plunged into a world of occultists, mind control, bloody sacrifice, and the resurrection of long dead gods. Coming into contact with what appears to be a nice piece of silverware it becomes obvious to Michael (Ray Lonnen) and his girlfriend that it’s something far more than what’s on the surface when another collector offers them ridiculous amounts of money for it. On his way to have the plate valued Michael nearly mows down a girl who is on the run after nearly becoming the victim of a ritualistic sacrifice in the hands of a Satanic sect (a common occurrence in the early eighties). Recognising the plate, she tells him that it was owned by the (real life) sixteenth century mathematician and occultist, John Dee. A struggle ensues for both the girl and the plate (revealed to be a scrying glass, something used for supernatural visualisation, fortune telling, etc.). Quite adventurous this episode showcases the talents of John Carson, the next best thing to James Mason, here almost resuming a very similar role to the one he played in Plague of the Zombies. There are nice touches of imagination occasionally punctuating, such as Carson’s hypnotic tilting of his head causing Lonnen’s character to lose balance, plus a couple of tense moments that add a little new life to a story that’s not particularly innovative. The music is also fairly conventional but appropriate for the material.


Visitor From The Grave; Directed by Peter Sasdy; UK Transmission 22nd November 1980

A neurotic American woman blows the face off an intruder as he attempts to rape her. Returning home her English husband is somewhat disturbed to find blood all over the place and his wife curled up on the bed in shock. But rather than call the police the husband convinces her that there could be legal problems considering they don’t have a licence for the gun, plus he thinks his wife would be checked into an institution for her actions: they cover up the crime and he buries the body in the woods. She soon begins catching glimpses of the ghost of the man she killed and seeks help from a medium who tells her that the ghost has returned for revenge. Among attractive location shooting, plus the use of a cool Jaguar XJS, the formula here is unfortunately too predictable to be enjoyable, featuring a revelation that anyone who has seen more than a handful of chillers will spot a mile off. Further to that the concluding scene is feeble to say the least, and brought to a strangely abrupt halt as if the editor suddenly realised he’d reached his fifty minute quotient.


The Two Faces of Evil; Directed by Alan Gibson; UK Transmission 29th November 1980

Out on a family road trip in the countryside, Janet thinks she sees a man in a raincoat standing in the bushes as they navigate a junction. Later on, a storm has kicked off and they see a hitchhiker ahead - someone again in a raincoat. Not entirely convinced they should be picking him up, the husband pulls over anyway. Minutes later the hooded man attacks the husband, sending the car off the road and causing it to crash. Janet wakes up in hospital, she and her son okay but the husband quite severely injured. None of the staff seem to be particularly concerned that he was attacked, looking at the woman as if she’s insane while she tries to explain. Then the police locate a corpse - the suspect in the attack incident - near the crash site, but he looks remarkably like Janet’s husband. Anxious to get back to normal she eventually takes her son and the injured man home to recover, but all is not necessarily as it seems and normality is something that may be further than she’d like. Opening with an incredibly atmospheric situation the scenario is set up quite beautifully as we’re drawn into what is clearly a frightening world. The transition from sunny roads to storm-driven landscape is well handled and the intended feel of the piece is identifiable. What follows is an escalating series of alarming occurrences that remind me of a particular film (which I won’t name in order to prevent giving anything away about the concluding act) but, despite one small gripe with an inconsistency becoming evident at the end, the episode still manages to stand on its own feet as an extremely sinister and chilling little tale.


The Mark of Satan; Directed by Don Leaver; UK Transmission 6th December 1980

A man undergoes brain surgery at an undisclosed hospital, the use of a mere and clearly inadequate local anaesthetic appearing to be in effect. Before dying he starts screaming, begging the surgeons (or whoever he believes is listening) not to touch his soul. Later on, a trainee mortuary attendant begins to get nervous when he realises the number 9 is popping up in his life with alarming regularity (his sweepstake winnings are nine pounds - hey, this was the eighties! He’s told to put a corpse into cabin number nine, etc.) and from there on his paranoia increases to a point where he’s becoming incoherent and homicidal, thinking that Satan himself is attempting to contact him. Are the people around him out to perform some sort of sacrifice or is it all happening within his mind? While the trainee is initially someone who many of us may be able to identify with, being a seemingly nice person struggling to cope with a new vocational situation, he gradually proves to be so psychotic it almost becomes too difficult to sympathise with him. Of course that’s partly the point as we’re never supposed to be sure whether the paranoia is simply that, or well-founded acknowledgement of a genuine threat. The characters are a little better played here than what was conventional for the series and, as may be viewed through the eyes of the protagonist, they do come across as quite sinister (Georgina Hale plays one of the creepiest single mothers you‘re ever likely to meet, plus Emrys James is gloriously theatrical in the role of Dr Harris). Hints at Rosemary’s Baby aside I did find it a little difficult to truly enjoy this slightly chaotic episode but the representation of confusion and fear is commendable.

Saturday, 17 December 2022

The Universal Mummy Series

Universal were almost responsible for initiating the first real horror boom at the beginning of the thirties with infamous movies already elsewhere discussed at Grim Cellar.  Perhaps the arrival of sound had a direct impact on the effectiveness of films to embellish a disturbing emotional manipulation of audience responses, and new possibilities were perceived.  In their search for new ideas, they turned to Egyptian history/mythology and to assist brought in their established master of terror at the time, Boris Karloff.

The Mummy (1932) briefly recounted an age more than three millennia prior to the discovery of an ancient scroll, where priest Im-Ho-Tep is consumed by love and mourning to a point where he commits sacrilege by exercising a hex to raise his woman from the dead.  For his sins he is forced to suffer one of the most tortuous deaths imaginable - burial alive.  In the early part of the twentieth century his tomb is opened and the bandaged corpse discovered, at which point a foolishly optimistic young archaeologist reads aloud the ancient scroll, releasing a curse that revives the mummified priest.  The young explorer goes insane and the priest departs into the night.  Later on, a strangely benevolent Egyptian - the priest having shed his bandages - appears on the scene and helps the explorers locate another tomb, something which leads to his realisation that one of the women, Helen, is actually the reincarnation of the lover that he died for centuries ago.  His objective is to reunite their souls but the girl whose body is inhabited by the princess’s soul must die to allow this.

For younger viewers more familiar with the Stephen Sommers/Brendan Fraser action-adventure yarns the original Universal film may be considered something of a whopping great bandaged borefest.  It is quite slow and very old fashioned in terms of cinema, while gore didn’t really exist in this era and scares were of the atmospheric variety (i.e., there wasn’t a 100-decibel soundtrack jab designed to make you leap involuntarily every time something frightening was supposed to happen).  It crafts a story that mixes the tragedy of impractical love with mythology and history, and the highlighting of cultural issues preventing two people from being together is just as relevant today.  After establishing himself as a classic cinematographer on many German silents Karl Freund was rushed into directing, ultimately proving himself here to be methodical and considered, sometimes imaginative at the helm.  There are inspired moments, such as Karloff’s foreboding narrative recollection of his former life, and the glowing eyes of course, though these do become a tad overused by the conclusion.  There’s also the inclusion of a beautiful clip of a wolf in medium shot howling against the moon - probably stock footage, a phenomenon to witness nonetheless.  Zita Johann is an alluringly naïve Helen, wearing amazingly low-cut dresses while not quite having the upper body physique for raincoat viewers (like me) to salivate over.  The Motion Picture Production Code became a serious entity in 1934, something established in the USA to essentially force film-makers to abide by a series of ultimately pointless rules that precluded sexual references, imagery, etc.  Therefore, films made prior to this change often contained elements that were slightly more risqué than their post-1934 counterparts, and the wardrobe of Johann I believe was a product of this.  The undisputed star of Universal’s early make-up era, Jack Pierce, provided groundbreaking processes for the mummy itself/himself.  Both bandaged and ‘unclothed’, Karloff’s make-up is stupendous even to this day.  One final surprise for those who only have vague recollections of these films is the mummy itself - in his stereotype form he is barely used here: we see him awaken at the film’s beginning, we see his feet stagger from the room, and that’s it.  Afterwards Karloff returns only as the Egyptian Ardath Bey, an exceedingly wrinkled though very human-looking man.  The Mummy achieves its goal well enough and, whilst possibly not quite a classic film held at the same heights as Dracula and Frankenstein, it possesses its fair share of eeriness combined with good storytelling.

It took the studio some time to follow up this moderately successful outing but it was inevitable at some point.  The Mummy’s Hand (1940) recreated fairly closely the mythos set up in the earlier movie.  Taking elements of the filmed flashback featuring Boris Karloff (who’s not participating in this one or any of the subsequent sequels in the conventional sense) we learn that Kharis was condemned to the same mummification and death for similar reasons.  Some time around the thirties or forties a couple of losers have their final chance at making a buck in Cairo before having to head back to the USA bankrupt.  They learn of a hidden tomb which is sure to be filled with concealed treasure and persuade an erratic magician to lend them $2000 to fund an expedition.  Along with some workers and the magician’s feisty young daughter they head out to uncover the tomb, getting more than they anticipated when the desecration of the Kharis resting place brings about his resurrection, something that’s welcomed by a local priest who enslaves Kharis to perform homicidal bidding.

It’s immediately obvious in the first sequel to The Mummy that the tone is lightened significantly, mostly through the implementation of two wannabe comedians in the principal roles.  Whilst their tomfoolery is generally incompetent, their comic timing being inadequate to some extent, the story and dialogue manage to keep your attention while you’re perfectly aware of what the film is building up to.  It takes some time to get there too, with about half the film passing before some action appears on the horizon.  However, I think this contributes towards the formulation of a reasonable helping of atmosphere.  This is where we see the mummy in all his traditional horror glory for the first time - a staggering, bandaged corpse intent on avenging the curse that has brought about his reanimated misery.  His eyes appear to be blacked out by a possible manipulation of the negative (an effect not completed for the trailer itself) and his presence, courtesy of highly prolific actor Tom Tyler, is ominous - Pierce once again graced the creature with his skills.  The flashback is quite a strange phenomenon: clearly they’ve used footage from the first film as they retell the story and Karloff is right there in many shots, but for close-ups it switches to new footage of Tyler, creating an oddly jarring effect.  It could be said, consequently, that Karloff is actually present in this film, though his participation is nonexistent.  While the budget for …Hand was approximately half that of its predecessor some of the production design may seem pretty outstanding, though that’s simply a result of economical set regurgitation - some of them were actually built for James Whale’s adventure story Green Hell.  Finally, the sole female of note this time is Peggy Moran and whilst not quite as revealingly dressed as Zita Johann she is visually appealing and her initially dominating approach is unwittingly sexy.  The Mummy’s Hand, directed by quickie specialist Christy Cabanne, is no doubt inferior in many respects to the original film.  Despite this inferiority, it is entertaining and the pace is perceptively executed.

The story of …Hand is recounted at the beginning of The Mummy’s Tomb (1942) where the two guys responsible for the expedition that kicked everything off have returned to the USA and grown older.  Still holding a grudge, however, the wizard who knows when it comes to mummified corpses (George Zucco) sends his servant across to the land of the free with the body of Kharis to reap vengeance on those who caused all the trouble decades earlier.  The servant sets himself up as a graveyard caretaker while sending the mummy out to kill off the two clowns and anyone genetically associated with them, one by one.

This one really is a quickie: not only does it only run for an hour but the first ten minutes of that are taken up with a recap of the previous story, via flashbacks and the narration of Dick Foran’s returning character Steve Banning.  Universal also managed to bring in Lon Chaney Junior to play the monster (no doubt a consequence of his success in The Wolf Man a year prior), something he would do in the following two films also.  They also managed to annoy the star in the process by dropping the ‘Jr.’ from the actor’s screen credit, something which favourably distinguished him from his famous father in his eyes.  Chaney doing a moderate job does not hide the fact that there is little real challenge in characterisation with this creature, which is mostly shuffling around unable to remember why his leg and arm are out of use.  The make-up, though not as proficient as the first movie, is suitably putrescent.  Some of the stunt work is quite rough on the actors, particularly when it comes to fire.  Several people are dangerously close to the flames at the end and one actor (who visibly falls against his torch) was reportedly burnt during filming.  Neil Varnick’s story is quite feeble and lacking a certain amount of imagination, resorting to Universal’s obligatory mob of angry villagers for the film’s climax - quite strange because they’re carrying burning torches and clubs despite the time period somewhere around the middle of the twentieth century by my calculations based on the men’s ages, etc.  The early sightings of the creature bring about a number of amusing situations when he manages to avoid being seen in almost every instance with the exception of his shadow, consequently this giving rise to several reports of ‘a shadow’ in the area!  Imagine West Midlands police responding to reports like that… The entertainment factor here is diminished compared to the preceding chapters but the flick does retain a certain charm in its madness.

Some time after the events of …Tomb a group of hip students are learning history in The Mummy’s Ghost (1944) when the teacher decides to tell them about the mysterious mummy attacks that once allegedly took place in their very town.  Whilst it all seems a little difficult to digest, they don’t realise that the mummy inexplicably survived (indeed, it just wanders out of the forest near the beginning) and is soon on the move when the college professor experiments with the Tanna leaves that grant it strength and life - he is drawn to the leaves instinctively, killing the professor in the process.  The servant (John Carradine) of Andoheb (George Zucco again) has been sent on a mission to track down the body of Kharis’s ancient lover, which has been shipped to a museum in the USA, but realises when the body crumbles that her spirit has reawakened in the shell of one of the young student girls.  The servant decides that she must be ‘reacquired’ by Kharis.  I’m sure they were making this stuff up as they went along at this point!

By about half way through …Ghost I’d pretty much resigned it to being a worthless pile of camel waste.  Carradine’s acting is serious to the point of being about as active as a plank of wood, the mummy make-up seems to have been substantially cheapened (though Pierce was still involved, perhaps rushed), the story pedestrian and generally uninspiring.  There are even clumsy errors such as Chaney’s useless arm suddenly becoming functional when he needs to carry an unconscious woman.  However, the damn film almost won me over by its conclusion: why?  Because of that bloody dog!  This thing outshines Lassie when it comes to intelligence.  It’s only one of those small Jack Russell type of canines but, boy, is it smarter than the humans in this film.  It actually responds to their statements and even goes to fetch the mob of angry villagers when the two heroes are in trouble...!  Also, the denouement of the story is quite grim compared to virtually all other Universal monster bashes, and the outcome surprised me.  It’s not a good film by any stretch but the dog provided a few smiles (though whether those were intended is another matter) and the climax is the most effective of the whole series.

Shot around the same time The Mummy’s Curse (1944) took Universal’s tendency towards temporal distortion one step further, with some pub-dwelling gypsy-types retelling some of the last movie’s events as being about twenty five years prior.  Adding that up with the bodily aging of some of the previous characters, etc., this should place the time around the 1980s by my calculations, however it seems more like the turn of the twentieth century at the beginning before strangely shifting to 1940s America.  I don’t suppose chronological logic was at the front of the minds of Universal’s writers… Anyway, there are plans to completely renovate the marsh near Mapleton, where the events of previous films took place, when a couple of museum archaeological buffs turn up wanting to dig out the mummy and his bride Princess Ananka (after having been left there at the end of …Ghost) to return them to the museum.  Some of the locals are concerned that this interfering with the mummy’s current resting place will arouse the curse again, fears which aren’t without good cause it seems.  After dredging half the swamp they soon find an empty space in the mud where ‘a large man’ would have lain, and of course a dead villager nearby.  Oh yes, and the giveaway, there’s a bit of bandage left on the murdered person (I shit you not).  While Kharis is roped in by one of the Egyptian servants to kill more people, this time Ananka also reawakens to wander around in a state of perpetual confusion regarding her origins or purpose.

The problem primarily by this point was the fact that the stories really had nowhere to go and very much continually rehashed ideas from earlier films.  Quite literally too, as we were very often treated to flashbacks of footage from the other movies despite meagre running times.  The mummy, again played by Lon Chaney Jr., was a creature of limited potential and was lucky to have his lifespan stretched out over this number of movies.  The Mummy’s Curse begins more in the vein of many of Universal’s other films of the period, almost a timeless entity in a dimension undiscovered.  The murders themselves are quite feeble - one guy stumbles in on a ritual during the awakening of the mummy and very simply asks what they’re up to, like one would, before the mummy, which would have been plainly in his sight, staggers right up to him without him noticing until he‘s actually being strangled.  There is one standout sequence in this film, and indeed one of the best of the whole series; the revival of Ananka: she squirms awkwardly out of her grave, her eyes covered in mud and barely able to open, then staggers off in a manner that the TV girl in Ring would have been proud of.  It’s possibly the creepiest scene in the whole mummy series and director Leslie Goodwins must have realised he was on to something because he gets his mileage out of it.  Arguably she’s also more eerie than any of the titular creatures since the series began, other than perhaps the barely glimpsed Karloff creation that kickstarted the whole franchise.  Aside from the reawakening of Ananka, …Curse is a derivative and uninspired finale to the series.

There was of course one more appearance for the monster to come: Abbott and Costello Meet the Mummy (1955), which I will begrudgingly comment on here for the sake of completeness.  Having discovered an extremely valuable medallion (which Lou accidentally swallows), the duo – stranded in Egypt at the time - attracts unwanted attentions of a ‘Klaris’ cult and businesswoman who are similarly interested in the ingested artefact.  It all winds up in a showdown between the various medallion hunters and the revived mummy himself.

Clearly Universal itself had no faith in horror films in the fifties, nor its own Monster legacy (which would, most likely against their expectations, survive in the hearts of generations of fans until this day and beyond).  This alongside a number of other near-concurrent irreverent horror revivals in a comedy context are testament to that.  The two comedians had been making films together for over a decade by this stage, and faced up against various monsters of Universal’s past on several occasions.  This was presumably successful at the time.  …Meet the Mummy would be their last pairing against one of these monsters, and almost their last, period.  Throughout this film the pair amuse audiences by making fools of themselves as the creature proves ineffective as a killing machine, though at least it would return the series to its Egyptian beginnings.  The mummy doesn’t look at all good either, although a couple of differences to the five 1930s/40s outings manifest themselves, such a periodic use of vocal cords, and no limp or useless arm, which I would say is the only good thing about this iteration of the creature.  However, despite the advantage of four usable limbs, there is no murder or bloodshed to be found here.  From a personal point of view none of the comedy really works for me either, so this film is effective neither as a comedy nor a horror for me, and thus is my least favourite of the series, if indeed one counts it as part of the series.

The mummy films provide some fun overall (aside from, ironically, the Abbott and Costello outing), yet were clearly not greatly respected by its studio.  This is apparent by the haphazard manner in which the sequel stories were rushed together and the running times as meagre as the films’ respective budgets.  The mummy (actually Im-Ho-Tep in the first one, Kharis in the following four, and Klaris in the A&B entry) had minimal development as a character beyond the first film though at least there was some narrative progression and continuation from film to film, but within each context there was little to do for the monster other than stagger around and kill.  In a sense he is almost a precursor to Michael Myers of Halloween (1978 onwards) or the homicidal lunatic of almost any other long-running slasher series - this is possibly the slasher movie in its embryonic infancy here, formulating many of the staples that would much later on become clichés in slasher cinema.  Compared to Universal’s other series of the time the creature is less charismatic and quite a lonely entity.  The fact that his arm and leg are virtually unusable (unless he needed to carry a helpless woman) did irritate me a little throughout - he’s rendered practically impotent and the explanation for this was briefly suggested early on in the series but afterwards employed simply as a tool for having him walk in a (then) tension-building fashion.  The aforementioned temporal distortion is something that stands out if the viewer is to watch them in sequence, yet there is some inadvertent bewilderment to be had with this.  In fact, the series as a whole works at its best if you simply switch off the logical side of your brain and accept the crazy rules on their own terms.  Though idiosyncratic in the extreme, it can never quite match up to the studio’s Dracula, Frankenstein, and Wolf Man cycles.  It’s a pity that the gradually diminishing quality of the series detracts from its achievements; nevertheless, it is something that will provide a reasonable degree of entertainment, and that’s what it’s all about at the end of the day.

As a footnote, I’ve owned these on both DVD and Blu-ray, the latter representing a noticeable upgrade in clarity and contrast – these films look surprisingly sharp and beautiful considering their vintage (and the lack of respect Universal seemed to have for them, at least in the years following their production; it’s a wonder they even survived).  In the UK the whole series (including the lamentable Abbott and Costello fun-take) is available on Blu-ray in one neat, relatively inexpensive multi-disc package that takes up no more space than a single film.  I like the overall design of the cover, which fits in neatly with the other Universal Monster releases, sitting well alongside one another on the shelf.

Monday, 29 August 2022

Gaslight

Gaslight (1944) features Ingrid Bergman as Paula, a woman traumatised at childhood finding apparent happiness a decade later once she meets suave Mr Perfect Frenchman, Gregory Anton (Charles Boyer).  Against her better judgement, he surreptitiously persuades her to return to her childhood home, the setting of her trauma.  They shift all of the old family furniture into the attic and set up the place as their marital abode.  Pretty quickly, however, Gregory adopts a controlling approach to their marriage, to a point where Paula becomes agoraphobic and increasingly neurotic and doubtful of her own sanity.  Particularly as she appears to develop kleptomaniac tendencies, and starts to literally hear bumps in the night...

Riveting performances from both Bergman and Boyer grip the viewer's attention throughout, Bergman in particular presenting a character disintegrating under the non-physical abuse she is subjected to throughout - it almost becomes unbearable as we watch her break down.  Gaslight is a poignant film about spousal abuse of an extreme psychological variety.  Joseph Cotten also shows up as the heroic nice guy, a possible saviour for Paula as he recognises something is not quite right from a spectator's perspective.  Angela Lansbury is also quite brilliant as the flirtatious, sneering - and threatening, to Paula's paranoid brain - cockney housemaid.  Really though it's Bergman's portrayed fragility that grips our emotions, probably my favourite of her performances.  As an aside, it must be said that the B&W film has a beautiful look throughout, capturing the oppressive house and fleetingly seen London streets in a gorgeous fashion.


Formerly released in the US on DVD (snapper case format - it's that old) as a Region 1 disc (double-sided), I recently compared it with a later pick-up, the HMV Premium Edition here in the UK, on Blu-ray.  Both present the film(s) in 1.33:1 B&W of course, although the Blu-ray is from a newer scan and sharper/cleaner with improved contrast by some margin - the picture really jumps out compared to the older DVD.  Audio is similar between the two discs although provided with a more robust DTS (mono) track on the Blu-ray.  The Blu-ray runs about thirty seconds longer although I can't quite see why. as the end and beginning credits look identical - this may be a result of improved scanning presenting the film at accurate speed but I can't be certain.  Both editions contain similar extras, the 1940 version in Standard Definition being the main one, two featurettes and a trailer.  The Blu-ray does add an hour-long radio play from a similar era, however.  On the plus side for the DVD, it contains more language tracks if you're not a native English speaker.  Surprisingly also, the 1940 version actually looks a little better on the DVD; I can only assume during the rescaling process to HD it lost some of its sharpness.  If you are particularly interested in that version the best option would be to buy the separate UK Blu-ray, available via the BFI.

Essentially a port of the US Warner Blu-ray, the HMV Premium Edition trumps it to some extent by adding a postcard set, slipcase, and a nice poster (approximately A3 size - see above).  Thus, surprisingly, the best worldwide edition of this powerful classic is actually available right here in the UK for a reasonable price, thanks to HMV's ever-pleasing Premium range.

Friday, 22 July 2022

Tragic Ceremony

One of the horror movies Camille Keaton made during a sojourn to Italy in the seventies prior to attaining infamy with I Spit on Your GraveTragic Ceremony (1972) was also one of Riccardo Freda's last films as director.  I always hope that there is renewed interest in Freda's work, a fresh light cast on him as a film-maker to be savioured in the same way that Fulci and Bava might be.  As it stands only a handful of his films have made their way to disc for posterity and present fans to cherish, and a couple I think desperately need to be restored before they vanish forever (if they haven't already).  Tragic Ceremony itself is marginally clumsy at times but with enough going for it to make it an enjoyable, fairly unique viewing experience.

A group of teens are lazing about, generally having a good time thanks to one of them being quite well off before his time (Bill, played by Euro-horror regular Tony Isbert, the Spanish equivalent of James Franco).  Their ebullience is cut short when the jeep gives up the ghost during a stormy night.  They find refuge in an isolated mansion, with reluctant acceptance and little hospitality from their hosts.  Jane (Keaton), however, seems to receive superior treatment for reasons unknown, and she herself develops an uncanny affinity for the place and situation.  While the rest of the group grow increasingly bored cooped up in one room, she goes wandering in the dark, rainy night through the passages of the house, only to become the unwilling - or perhaps destined - participant in a black mass sacrifice that's already underway.  Before the ritual is carried through to logical conclusion, the rest of the group discover what's going on.  Unwittingly they become the catalyst for a bloodbath, as one bloody killing leads to another before their very eyes.  Somehow surviving the massacre the traumatised group head back to Bill's rich dwelling, only to be turned away from there.  It's not long before the mass murder is formally discovered and the police are fumbling through to figure out what happened.

Tragic Ceremony has some great moments and a slight supernatural undertone.  The black mass is a near-surreal nightmare preceded by Keaton fetchingly wandering around the mansion with flimsy attire and candlesticks, much as Barbara Steele might have in the decade before.  It also culminates in the aforementioned massacre, quite a scene as one kill triggers another.  The only complaint here is that either Freda or the editor decide to replay certain shots later in the film to ridiculous excess, thereby diminishing them of their power somewhat.  On route, the film delivers some trademarks of Italian gothic horror, a genre Freda had been involved with before on a number of occasions.  Here it collides - as it often did in the early seventies - with the contemporary, almost as if the horror baton was being handed on between the decades to suit a changing audience.  I think Keaton was brilliant in these European films, her facial expressions alluding to much more going on underneath combined with her very much being an appealing presence generally.  It must be stated that Tragic Ceremony is not all it could have been.  However, with its surreal edge and at times nightmarish logic ever present, over the years I've not grown tired of rewatching it, something that I cannot say for much that spews forth from identity-politics obsessed Hollywood this century.

The film was released by Dark Sky Films on DVD about 2008, and more recently by the incredible Vinegar Syndrome on Blu-ray.  They both present the same cut of the film (running a few seconds longer on Blu only because of the presence of VS's iconic ident at the end), albeit with revised subtitles on the later edition.  Amusingly the incredibly cumbersome onscreen Italian title is translated as is on the Dark Sky disc (roughly speaking to Extract from the Secret Archives of the Police of a European Capital), whereas the same title on the VS is simply translated as 'Tragic Ceremony'... Aspect ratio is 1.78:1 on each disc, perhaps a smidgeon more information being visible on the VS.  Italian language-only (I'm not sure if there is an English dub) audio quality is at a higher bitrate on the VS Blu, although it is limited to the standards of the time and thus the viewer would be hard pushed to notice much difference I think.  The picture quality itself is where the Blu-ray excels, being significantly cleaner and more detailed.  The DVD was reasonably good for its time but is put to bed here without much doubt.  The Blu-ray contains an audio commentary and picture gallery (of Keaton) that the DVD does not, while they both contain the same 13 minute interview with Keaton herself.  The DVD does have a trailer that the Blu-ray is missing for some reason; I wouldn't say this is a huge loss.  In terms of region locking, the DVD is fixed to region 1, whereas the Blu-ray covers all regions.  Finally the VS disc (at least the edition in the first run Camille Keaton in Italy boxed set that it came in) thoughtfully has a reversible cover adorned with appealing art on both sides.  Overall the 2K restoration (reportedly of the 35mm negative) performed by VS is superb, the best edition available, and preserves the film the way it should be for generations to come.

Saturday, 16 July 2022

Vivarium

Society's leaders, whoever they may be, have laid before you an established, very well walked - or crawled - path, and they would recommend you to take it (there's surprisingly little in way of alternative options anyway): grow up whilst acquiring an education (i.e. the world is the way we are telling you it is), leave school and get even more educated, find a partner, find a job, find a house, settle into it, produce offspring, die.  There are a few extras, such as discover new ways to despise your fellow human beings (a neat little distraction and focal point for your energy) and assimilate as much as the media can feed you.  The point of all this is unclear; perhaps there was a point to your existence but it has been lost in the shaping of your essentially predetermined life by others who remain unknown to you.

If I may be as bold, I will make a recommendation contrary to the above: do not, if at all possible, follow the established path.  Particularly if you are male.  If you do find a partner, no matter how perfect she may be, do not if you can avoid it cohabitate, especially do not get married, and if nothing else: never, ever, EVER impregnate someone.  Your life will be over, even if you don't realise it at that point, and you will have satisfied the purpose laid down before you by those unknown others.  Tricked into a marital existence where your finances and freedom will be forever compromised while you are drained very gradually of your soul.  And once you have produced the offspring so begged of you, so acclaimed as normal behaviour, anything that was ever unique about you or your potential will be eliminated over time, and that offspring will replace you.  You will become redundant, and figuratively or literally - it really won't matter to the world - dead.  Your leaders won't have to dig your grave for you, you will voluntarily do it yourself.

This paragraph doesn't contain spoilers as such, but Vivarium is best viewed to my mind without knowing too much about it.  A young couple are perusing the housing market for their new nest, the perfect place to conventionally exist and bring up the child that does not yet exist in their lives.  They discover an estate agent selling homes on what appears to be a newly rooted development, some drive away.  A strange man to be selling property, the couple reluctantly drive along with him to take a cursory look at the place, more out of politeness or persuasion than any real volition.  Once in the bland estate, devoid of people, where all of the new houses look pretty much alike, they wander around the intended sale without too much of a spark going off.  Then the estate agent departs without warning.  They decide to do the same, realising it to be perplexingly impossible to find their way back out of the estate.  Eventually their car runs out of fuel right outside the very house they didn't want in the first place, so they're forced to stay the night.  The next day, or days, they desperately try to get out of the town but cannot locate the exit, nor any other people.  Eventually they resign to accepting they are trapped.  At which point a child is delivered to them, the promise of freedom written in the box should they manage to raise the child.  At this point their troubles really fire up.

Taking a blend of horror and science fiction as its genre base, 2019's Vivarium (directed by Lorcan Finnegan) is really a grim social satire which I see as a commentary on the life you are quite likely to lead, a story that - if you see through its metaphors - is also likely to scare the bejesus out of you.  The bland estate and its identical houses, a place full of nobody, a 'job' of sorts that Tom goes to each day that is largely fruitless and ultimately self-destructive, deteriorating relationships, and a child that is frankly one of the scariest children ever put on screen.  If you were half considering children before watching this film, you will - wisely in my opinion - decide against it afterwards!  All of this is delivered with a heavy dose of surrealism and no attempt to pretend that the world Tom and Gemma find themselves is remotely real.  Sort of like your own world really.  If you want conventional narrative - that thing that you think applies to your life - you've come to the wrong place with this film.

I think the project itself could have taken a stronger path but the ideas themselves combined with the enslaved plight of the ordinary couple grab your interest and really keep it ensnared throughout the running time.  If I had to pick issues it would primarily be in Jesse Eisenberg, who I think is miscast and not capable of delivering the raw emotional disintegration that would have made his character's hell much more poignant.  British-born Imogen Poots (you might recognise her from 28 Weeks Later) as Gemma does a better job of displaying her suffering.  And whoever that kid is, well, I never want to run into him in my nightmares!  The other approach I would have taken is to grant the world slightly more verisimilitude, but not completely.  I get that the filmmakers wanted this to look unreal, I personally think it would have hit the mark harder if it resembled what appears to be reality just a little more closely (i.e. as it is, many people might simply see this as a surreal science fiction rather than a distorted mirror designed, possibly, to aid awakening).  Still, they are minor gripes and overall this Danish sourced production is a very impactful one, and one that kept me thinking for days afterwards.  There's not too much in modern cinema that manages that.

In terms of purchasing, annoyingly the British distributors have chosen to put this out of DVD only at time of writing.  I would suggest not supporting such decisions and go for an overseas Blu-ray, either from the US or if you want a reasonably priced option, Germany.  The film did play on Film 4 recently, which is of course a convenient way to check it out first.

Saturday, 9 July 2022

Singles

Singles (1992) is without a doubt one of Cameron Crowe's best films, and one of my personal favourites.  Not too much of a plot going on to speak of, it follows a group of twenty-somethings around (and believe me, back then twenty-somethings were way less obnoxious, entitled, and self-obsessed than they generally are today!) as they navigate their relationships and blossoming lives (before it all goes to Hell, some time around your forties...).  Janet - Bridget Fonda, wonderful here - is questioning her relationship with rocker Cliff (Matt Dillon, again absolutely brilliant) while Campbell Scott is apparently finding the love of his life in Linda - is it on or off? - and perpetual singleton Debbie is going through a dating agency to see what or who works (not helped by her flatmate Pam, who's quite happy to steal Debbie's latest find from right under her nose).  You get the idea.  It's all set to a Seattle backdrop with the then-popular grunge scene forming many parts of the soundtrack.  With a couple of lovely cameos (Tim Burton shows up as 'the next Martin Scorsese'), it's a beautiful film that I never get tired of rewatching every few years.  The music track is excellent, the writing spot on, the characters played universally convincingly, and the story just, well, nice.  There's not too much nice in the world today, so it's even more welcome now than back in the 90s.

I've had this one over the years on tape, DVD, and Blu-ray.  I was a tad disappointed when it appeared on Blu-ray because it didn't look like Warner had put in a whole heap of effort that this one should deserve.  However, the newer disc is actually pretty decent and a world better than its standard definition, and lower, predecessors.  Both the DVD and Blu-ray are framed at 1.78:1, although the former does reveal slightly more information around the sides.  The image didn't initially look to me like it had been bestowed with a full-blown remaster, but looking at the two discs side by side it's obvious that the Blu-ray is significantly sharper, bolder, and more colourful.  Audio is stereo on both discs, losslessly compressed with DTS-HD Master Audio on the Blu of course, so it's a winner here too.  It goes without saying that the Blu-ray also plays at the correct frame rate (the PAL DVD is sped slightly at 25 frames per second).

Extras were slim on the DVD: you got a theatrical trailer and a couple of three minute deleted scenes.  On the Blu there is the trailer but you also get a few minutes of entertaining goofs, three full performances from the live gig that was shot for the film (Alice in Chains and Soundgarden), and a plethora of deleted scenes.  My only gripe here is that there is no Play-All function on the deleted scenes, so you have to keep clicking through the menu if you want to watch them all, which most people will - c'mon, Warner!  Still, I can't complain too much at the content even though a Crowe commentary or something would have been a massive bonus.  I picked up the German Blu-ray, which appears to be identical to the American Blu (even the menu is in English), the only difference being the Germans have put their usual, oddly large certification logo on the front cover.  Unusually, the cover is not reversible (to display it without the certificate), but considering it's much cheaper for us in England to import from Germany (for some reason it's not currently available here) now than it is from the US, this huge '12' a minor point.  Overall, if you own Singles on DVD (or VHS or Laserdisc), it's most definitely worth upgrading to this Blu-ray.  If you've never seen the film itself before, I think you're missing out, go check it out!